Australia vs South Africa: Policy and Operational Strategy (P0)
Policy and Operational Strategy (P0) over time
- Australia
- South Africa
How they compare
Australia currently reports 109.02 against 107.75 in South Africa, a difference of 1.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was South Africa ahead.
Australia ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 27th of 47 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 103.01 | 104.85 | 1.84 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher policy and operational strategy (p0), Australia or South Africa?
- Australia, at 109.02 against 107.75 in South Africa as of 2018.
- What is the difference in policy and operational strategy (p0) between Australia and South Africa?
- 1.27, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for policy and operational strategy (p0)?
- Australia ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 27th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Policy and Operational Strategy (P0) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).