Kenya vs Philippines: Policy and Operational Strategy (P0)
Policy and Operational Strategy (P0) over time
- Kenya
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 119.15 against 116.37 in Kenya, a difference of 2.78.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Philippines ahead.
Kenya ranks 23rd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 105.13 | 109.59 | 4.45 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher policy and operational strategy (p0), Kenya or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 119.15 against 116.37 in Kenya as of 2018.
- What is the difference in policy and operational strategy (p0) between Kenya and Philippines?
- 2.78, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Kenya and Philippines rank globally for policy and operational strategy (p0)?
- Kenya ranks 23rd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Policy and Operational Strategy (P0) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).