Japan vs Malaysia: Policy Formulation (PO)
Policy Formulation (PO) over time
- Japan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 118.14 against 118.14 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Malaysia ahead.
Japan ranks 15th and Malaysia ranks 15th of 47 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 112.09 | 109.43 | 2.67 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher policy formulation (po), Japan or Malaysia?
- Japan, at 118.14 against 118.14 in Malaysia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in policy formulation (po) between Japan and Malaysia?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Japan and Malaysia rank globally for policy formulation (po)?
- Japan ranks 15th and Malaysia ranks 15th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Policy Formulation (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).