Argentina vs Malaysia: Policy Implementation (PO)
Policy Implementation (PO) over time
- Argentina
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 194.77 against 179.2 in Argentina, a difference of 15.57.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Malaysia ahead.
Argentina ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 47 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 132.45 | 131.59 | 0.8543 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher policy implementation (po), Argentina or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 194.77 against 179.2 in Argentina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in policy implementation (po) between Argentina and Malaysia?
- 15.57, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Malaysia rank globally for policy implementation (po)?
- Argentina ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Policy Implementation (PO) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).