Belgium vs Czechia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Belgium
-2.35 million
in 2025
Czechia
-1.45 million
in 2025
Belgium rank
24th
Czechia rank
22nd

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Belgium
  • Czechia
-20.0M-15.0M-10.0M-5.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports -1.45 million against -2.35 million in Belgium, a difference of 895,950.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Czechia ahead.

Belgium ranks 24th and Czechia ranks 22nd of 83 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s -1.35 million 0 1.35 million Czechia
2010s -4.58 million -160,338 4.42 million Czechia
2020s -2.25 million -6.36 million 4.11 million Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Belgium or Czechia?
Czechia, at -1.45 million against -2.35 million in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Belgium and Czechia?
895,950, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Czechia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Czechia rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Belgium ranks 24th and Czechia ranks 22nd of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, interest, Up to 1 month, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Au. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Czechia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-3/belgium/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-3/belgium/czechia/">Belgium vs Czechia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, interest, Up to 1 month, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Au
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
85 places, 1,663 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.