Chile vs Mongolia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Chile
-200.49 million
in 2025
Mongolia
-214.33 million
in 2025
Chile rank
42nd
Mongolia rank
43rd

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Chile
  • Mongolia
-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Chile currently reports -200.49 million against -214.33 million in Mongolia, a difference of 13.84 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mongolia ahead.

Chile ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 43rd of 86 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s -134.37 million 0 134.37 million Mongolia
2020s -215.94 million -110.88 million 105.05 million Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Chile or Mongolia?
Chile, at -200.49 million against -214.33 million in Mongolia as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Chile and Mongolia?
13.84 million, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mongolia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
How do Chile and Mongolia rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Chile ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 43rd of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central G. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mongolia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-4/chile/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-4/chile/mongolia/">Chile vs Mongolia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central G
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
87 places, 1,726 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.