Lithuania vs Peru: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Lithuania
-1.39 billion
in 2020
Peru
-1.46 billion
in 2025
Lithuania rank
65th
Peru rank
66th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Lithuania
  • Peru
-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200120132025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -1.39 billion against -1.46 billion in Peru, a difference of 70.82 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Peru ahead.

Lithuania ranks 65th and Peru ranks 66th of 86 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Peru Difference Ahead
2000s -300.17 million -625.33 million 325.17 million Lithuania
2010s -566.56 million -314.50 million 252.06 million Peru
2020s -1.39 billion -234.00 million 1.16 billion Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Lithuania or Peru?
Lithuania, at -1.39 billion against -1.46 billion in Peru as of 2020.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Lithuania and Peru?
70.82 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Peru?
17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
How do Lithuania and Peru rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Lithuania ranks 65th and Peru ranks 66th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central G. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Peru: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-4/lithuania/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-4/lithuania/peru/">Lithuania vs Peru: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central G
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
87 places, 1,726 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.