Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Serbia
-375.89 million
in 2025
Sri Lanka
-297.44 million
in 2025
Serbia rank
50th
Sri Lanka rank
47th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Serbia
  • Sri Lanka
-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0201520202025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -297.44 million against -375.89 million in Serbia, a difference of 78.45 million.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 50th and Sri Lanka ranks 47th of 85 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s -550.37 million -850.03 million 299.66 million Serbia
2020s -461.99 million -554.12 million 92.13 million Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Serbia or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at -297.44 million against -375.89 million in Serbia as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
78.45 million, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Serbia ranks 50th and Sri Lanka ranks 47th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central G. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-4/serbia/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-4/serbia/sri-lanka/">Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central G
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
87 places, 1,726 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.