Brazil vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Brazil
3.91 billion
in 2025
Malta
7.54 million
in 2025
Brazil rank
1st
Malta rank
4th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Brazil
  • Malta
-20.0B-10.0B010.0B200020122025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 3.91 billion against 7.54 million in Malta, a difference of 3.91 billion.

That makes Brazil's figure about 518.7 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malta ahead.

Brazil ranks 1st and Malta ranks 4th of 85 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Malta Difference Ahead
2000s -3.54 billion -400,000 3.54 billion Malta
2010s 1.28 billion 5.30 million 1.27 billion Brazil
2020s 926.86 million 7.23 million 919.63 million Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Brazil or Malta?
Brazil, at 3.91 billion against 7.54 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Brazil and Malta?
3.91 billion, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malta?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Malta rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Brazil ranks 1st and Malta ranks 4th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cent. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-5/brazil/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-5/brazil/malta/">Brazil vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, More than 3 months and up to 1 year (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Cent
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
87 places, 1,725 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.