Belgium vs Germany: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Belgium
-2.35 million
in 2025
Germany
-274,592
in 2025
Belgium rank
19th
Germany rank
17th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Belgium
  • Germany
-30.0B-20.0B-10.0B0199920122025

How they compare

Germany currently reports -274,592 against -2.35 million in Belgium, a difference of 2.08 million.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Germany ahead.

Belgium ranks 19th and Germany ranks 17th of 84 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Germany Difference Ahead
2000s -683.12 million -2.72 billion 2.04 billion Belgium
2010s -223.14 million -264.15 million 41.01 million Belgium
2020s -2.25 million -22.42 million 20.17 million Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Belgium or Germany?
Germany, at -274,592 against -2.35 million in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Belgium and Germany?
2.08 million, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Belgium ranks 19th and Germany ranks 17th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excludi. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Germany: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-6/belgium/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-6/belgium/germany/">Belgium vs Germany: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excludi
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,714 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.