Canada vs Chile: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Canada
-2.94 billion
in 2025
Chile
-3.82 billion
in 2025
Canada rank
74th
Chile rank
75th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Canada
  • Chile
-6.0B-4.0B-2.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Canada currently reports -2.94 billion against -3.82 billion in Chile, a difference of 876.87 million.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Canada ranks 74th and Chile ranks 75th of 84 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Chile Difference Ahead
2000s -1.42 billion -1.13 billion 287.76 million Chile
2010s -1.39 billion -3.69 billion 2.30 billion Canada
2020s -3.68 billion -3.26 billion 412.48 million Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Canada or Chile?
Canada, at -2.94 billion against -3.82 billion in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Canada and Chile?
876.87 million, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Canada and Chile rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Canada ranks 74th and Chile ranks 75th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excludi. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Chile: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-6/canada/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-6/canada/chile/">Canada vs Chile: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excludi
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,714 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.