Chile vs Mauritius: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Chile
-11.25 million
in 2025
Mauritius
-24.01 million
in 2025
Chile rank
24th
Mauritius rank
27th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Chile currently reports -11.25 million against -24.01 million in Mauritius, a difference of 12.76 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 84 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s -35.19 million -56.98 million 21.78 million Chile
2020s -68.02 million -25.00 million 43.02 million Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at -11.25 million against -24.01 million in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Chile and Mauritius?
12.76 million, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Chile ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-7/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-7/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,689 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.