Ecuador vs Poland: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Ecuador
-1.98 billion
in 2025
Poland
-1.71 billion
in 2025
Ecuador rank
73rd
Poland rank
71st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Ecuador
  • Poland
-4.0B-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports -1.71 billion against -1.98 billion in Ecuador, a difference of 273.36 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Poland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 73rd and Poland ranks 71st of 84 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Poland Difference Ahead
2010s -880.11 million -66.20 million 813.91 million Poland
2020s -1.09 billion -2.02 billion 929.69 million Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Ecuador or Poland?
Poland, at -1.71 billion against -1.98 billion in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Ecuador and Poland?
273.36 million, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Ecuador ranks 73rd and Poland ranks 71st of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Poland: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-7/ecuador/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-7/ecuador/poland/">Ecuador vs Poland: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,689 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.