Euro Area (EA) vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Euro Area (EA)
0
in 2025
Malta
0
in 2025
Euro Area (EA) rank
1st
Malta rank
1st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Euro Area (EA)
  • Malta
-1.2B-1.0B-750.0M-500.0M-250.0M0199920122025

How they compare

Euro Area (EA) currently reports 0 against 0 in Malta, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Euro Area (EA) ahead.

Euro Area (EA) ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 1 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Euro Area (EA) averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro Area (EA) Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 0 -14,406 14,406 Euro Area (EA)
2010s -45.18 million -9.38 million 35.80 million Malta
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Euro Area (EA) or Malta?
Euro Area (EA), at 0 against 0 in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Euro Area (EA) and Malta?
0, with Euro Area (EA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro Area (EA) and Malta?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Euro Area (EA) and Malta rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Euro Area (EA) ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro Area (EA) vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-7/euro-area-ea/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-7/euro-area-ea/malta/">Euro Area (EA) vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,689 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.