Austria vs Cyprus: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Austria
-150.40 million
in 2025
Cyprus
-69.52 million
in 2022
Austria rank
27th
Cyprus rank
25th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Austria
  • Cyprus
-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B0199920122025

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports -69.52 million against -150.40 million in Austria, a difference of 80.88 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cyprus ahead.

Austria ranks 27th and Cyprus ranks 25th of 84 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Cyprus Difference Ahead
2010s -4.75 billion -9.15 million 4.74 billion Cyprus
2020s -2.43 billion -23.17 million 2.41 billion Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Austria or Cyprus?
Cyprus, at -69.52 million against -150.40 million in Austria as of 2022.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Austria and Cyprus?
80.88 million, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cyprus?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Austria and Cyprus rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Austria ranks 27th and Cyprus ranks 25th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (I. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Cyprus: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-8/austria/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-8/austria/cyprus/">Austria vs Cyprus: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (I
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,697 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.