Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Luxembourg
0
in 2025
Slovenia
0
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Slovenia rank
1st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Slovenia
-1.0B-800.0M-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 against 0 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Slovenia ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 84 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s -12.25 million -11.25 million 1.00 million Slovenia
2010s 0 -92.39 million 92.39 million Luxembourg
2020s 0 -39.52 million 39.52 million Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Luxembourg or Slovenia?
Luxembourg, at 0 against 0 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Luxembourg and Slovenia?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Slovenia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Slovenia rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (I. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-8/luxembourg/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-8/luxembourg/slovenia/">Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (I
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,697 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.