Guatemala vs Spain: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Guatemala
-72.10 million
in 2025
Spain
-59.84 million
in 2024
Guatemala rank
40th
Spain rank
38th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Guatemala
  • Spain
-80.0M-60.0M-40.0M-20.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Spain currently reports -59.84 million against -72.10 million in Guatemala, a difference of 12.26 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Spain ahead.

Guatemala ranks 40th and Spain ranks 38th of 84 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Spain Difference Ahead
2010s -47.38 million -1.03 million 46.35 million Spain
2020s -53.52 million -21.70 million 31.82 million Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Guatemala or Spain?
Spain, at -59.84 million against -72.10 million in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Guatemala and Spain?
12.26 million, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Spain?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Spain rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Guatemala ranks 40th and Spain ranks 38th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, Up to 1 month, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary A. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Spain: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-9/guatemala/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign-9/guatemala/spain/">Guatemala vs Spain: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, principal, Up to 1 month, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary A
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,716 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.