Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-28.14 million
in 2025
Namibia
-28.56 million
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
28th
Namibia rank
29th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Namibia
-30.0M-25.0M-20.0M-15.0M-10.0M201920222025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -28.14 million against -28.56 million in Namibia, a difference of 420,000.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 29th of 84 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -28.14 million against -28.56 million in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
420,000, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 29th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, interest, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, interest, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,684 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.