Georgia vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Georgia
-47.44 million
in 2025
Lithuania
-41.35 million
in 2020
Georgia rank
35th
Lithuania rank
33rd

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Georgia
  • Lithuania
-400.0M-300.0M-200.0M-100.0M0200420142025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -41.35 million against -47.44 million in Georgia, a difference of 6.09 million.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 33rd of 85 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s -10.94 million -167.93 million 156.99 million Georgia
2010s -11.20 million -244.59 million 233.39 million Georgia
2020s -12.09 million -41.35 million 29.26 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Georgia or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at -41.35 million against -47.44 million in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Georgia and Lithuania?
6.09 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lithuania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Lithuania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Georgia ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 33rd of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, interest, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign/georgia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-foreign/georgia/lithuania/">Georgia vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Foreign currency loans, securities and deposits, interest, More than 1 and up to 3 months, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,684 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.