Jordan vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Jordan
-40.45 million
in 2025
Malta
-234.81 million
in 2025
Jordan rank
34th
Malta rank
35th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Jordan
  • Malta
-800.0M-600.0M-400.0M-200.0M0200920172025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports -40.45 million against -234.81 million in Malta, a difference of 194.36 million.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malta ahead.

Jordan ranks 34th and Malta ranks 35th of 55 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Malta Difference Ahead
2010s -243.29 million -324.40 million 81.11 million Jordan
2020s -320.88 million -224.61 million 96.27 million Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Jordan or Malta?
Jordan, at -40.45 million against -234.81 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Jordan and Malta?
194.36 million, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Malta?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Malta rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Jordan ranks 34th and Malta ranks 35th of 55 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), More than 1 and up to 3 months, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liqui. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-2/jordan/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-2/jordan/malta/">Jordan vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), More than 1 and up to 3 months, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liqui
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
57 places, 1,077 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.