Belgium vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Belgium
-61.10 million
in 2025
Lithuania
-32.08 million
in 2025
Belgium rank
34th
Lithuania rank
32nd

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Belgium
  • Lithuania
-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -32.08 million against -61.10 million in Belgium, a difference of 29.02 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 32nd of 51 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 0 -871.53 million 871.53 million Belgium
2020s -51.06 million -535.29 million 484.23 million Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Belgium or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at -32.08 million against -61.10 million in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Belgium and Lithuania?
29.02 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lithuania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Lithuania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Belgium ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-3/belgium/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-3/belgium/lithuania/">Belgium vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,024 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.