Malta vs Sweden: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Malta
-759.50 million
in 2025
Sweden
-1.56 billion
in 2025
Malta rank
37th
Sweden rank
40th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Malta
  • Sweden
-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Malta currently reports -759.50 million against -1.56 billion in Sweden, a difference of 799.50 million.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 40th of 51 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s -338.90 million -4.82 billion 4.48 billion Malta
2010s -278.25 million -6.12 billion 5.84 billion Malta
2020s -595.39 million -3.19 billion 2.60 billion Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Malta or Sweden?
Malta, at -759.50 million against -1.56 billion in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Malta and Sweden?
799.50 million, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sweden?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Malta and Sweden rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Malta ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 40th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sweden: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-3/malta/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-3/malta/sweden/">Malta vs Sweden: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), More than 3 months and up to 1 year, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,024 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.