Belgium vs Norway: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Belgium
2.35 million
in 2025
Norway
0
in 2024
Belgium rank
24th
Norway rank
26th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Belgium
  • Norway
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B200020122025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 2.35 million against 0 in Norway, a difference of 2.35 million.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 24th and Norway ranks 26th of 53 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 592.83 million 4.60 million 588.23 million Belgium
2010s 206.40 million 171.84 million 34.56 million Belgium
2020s 28.76 million 0 28.76 million Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Belgium or Norway?
Belgium, at 2.35 million against 0 in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Belgium and Norway?
2.35 million, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Belgium ranks 24th and Norway ranks 26th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Up to 1 month, Inflows, Long positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Gui. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Norway: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-4/belgium/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and-4/belgium/norway/">Belgium vs Norway: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Up to 1 month, Inflows, Long positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Gui
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 1,090 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.