Denmark vs Romania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Denmark
0
in 2025
Romania
0
in 2023
Denmark rank
1st
Romania rank
1st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Romania
-12.5B-10.0B-7.5B-5.0B-2.5B0199920122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0 against 0 in Romania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 59 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Romania Difference Ahead
2000s -12.16 billion -535.80 million 11.62 billion Romania
2010s 0 -5.40 million 5.40 million Denmark
2020s -155.23 million 0 155.23 million Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Denmark or Romania?
Denmark, at 0 against 0 in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Denmark and Romania?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Romania?
6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Romania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Up to 1 month, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Romania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and/denmark/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and/denmark/romania/">Denmark vs Romania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Up to 1 month, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
61 places, 1,133 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.