Spain vs Sri Lanka: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Spain
-1.60 billion
in 2020
Sri Lanka
-729.15 million
in 2025
Spain rank
47th
Sri Lanka rank
44th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
-10.0B-7.5B-5.0B-2.5B0200220132025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -729.15 million against -1.60 billion in Spain, a difference of 871.16 million.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Spain ranks 47th and Sri Lanka ranks 44th of 59 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s -1.33 billion -180.20 million 1.15 billion Sri Lanka
2020s -1.60 billion -172.00 million 1.43 billion Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Spain or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at -729.15 million against -1.60 billion in Spain as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Spain and Sri Lanka?
871.16 million, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sri Lanka?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Spain and Sri Lanka rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Spain ranks 47th and Sri Lanka ranks 44th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Up to 1 month, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Sri Lanka: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and/spain/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-forwards-and/spain/sri-lanka/">Spain vs Sri Lanka: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis-s-vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Up to 1 month, Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
61 places, 1,133 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.