Italy vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Italy
-8.26 million
in 2025
Lithuania
-63.89 million
in 2024
Italy rank
39th
Lithuania rank
42nd

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Italy
  • Lithuania
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B200020122025

How they compare

Italy currently reports -8.26 million against -63.89 million in Lithuania, a difference of 55.63 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.

Italy ranks 39th and Lithuania ranks 42nd of 47 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 0 -1.27 million 1.27 million Italy
2010s 496.94 million -63.37 million 560.31 million Italy
2020s 490.92 million -114.76 million 605.67 million Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Italy or Lithuania?
Italy, at -8.26 million against -63.89 million in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Italy and Lithuania?
55.63 million, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Lithuania?
18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Italy and Lithuania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Italy ranks 39th and Lithuania ranks 42nd of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Auth. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other-2/italy/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other-2/italy/lithuania/">Italy vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets, More than 1 and up to 3 months (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Auth
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
49 places, 878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.