Kazakhstan vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Kazakhstan
0
in 2022
Malta
928,250
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
11th
Malta rank
9th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M200320142025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 928,250 against 0 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 928,250.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Malta ranks 9th of 53 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 28.75 million 1.87 million 26.88 million Kazakhstan
2010s 28.75 million -14,502 28.76 million Kazakhstan
2020s 19.17 million 15.00 million 4.17 million Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Kazakhstan or Malta?
Malta, at 928,250 against 0 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Kazakhstan and Malta?
928,250, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malta?
14 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
How do Kazakhstan and Malta rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Malta ranks 9th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Centr. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/kazakhstan/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/kazakhstan/malta/">Kazakhstan vs Malta: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Centr
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 1,039 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.