Latvia vs Netherlands: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Latvia
0
in 2025
Netherlands
0
in 2025
Latvia rank
11th
Netherlands rank
11th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Latvia
  • Netherlands
-2.5B-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0 against 0 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 11th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 53 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s -27.22 million -377.33 million 350.12 million Latvia
2010s -197.85 million -61.60 million 136.25 million Netherlands
2020s -942.38 million 0 942.38 million Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Latvia or Netherlands?
Latvia, at 0 against 0 in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Latvia and Netherlands?
0, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Latvia ranks 11th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Centr. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Netherlands: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/latvia/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-other/latvia/netherlands/">Latvia vs Netherlands: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Other predetermined short term net drains on foreign currency assets, Up to 1 month (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Centr
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 1,039 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.