Belarus vs Chile: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Belarus
-1.48 billion
in 2025
Chile
-1.73 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
58th
Chile rank
61st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Belarus
  • Chile
-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200020122025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -1.48 billion against -1.73 billion in Chile, a difference of 245.54 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 58th and Chile ranks 61st of 84 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Chile Difference Ahead
2000s -154.93 million -212.00 million 57.06 million Belarus
2010s -770.35 million -261.38 million 508.97 million Chile
2020s -1.10 billion -1.16 billion 52.77 million Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Belarus or Chile?
Belarus, at -1.48 billion against -1.73 billion in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Belarus and Chile?
245.54 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Belarus ranks 58th and Chile ranks 61st of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total foreign currency loans securities and deposits, interest, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Chile: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-2/belarus/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-2/belarus/chile/">Belarus vs Chile: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total foreign currency loans securities and deposits, interest, Outflows (reserves template) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
86 places, 1,714 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.