Estonia vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Estonia
-1.72 billion
in 2025
Lithuania
-2.97 billion
in 2025
Estonia rank
43rd
Lithuania rank
44th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Estonia
  • Lithuania
-15.0B-10.0B-5.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Estonia currently reports -1.72 billion against -2.97 billion in Lithuania, a difference of 1.25 billion.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 43rd and Lithuania ranks 44th of 60 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s -560.90 million -5.12 billion 4.56 billion Estonia
2020s -1.79 billion -3.19 billion 1.40 billion Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Estonia or Lithuania?
Estonia, at -1.72 billion against -2.97 billion in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Estonia and Lithuania?
1.25 billion, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Estonia ranks 43rd and Lithuania ranks 44th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Da. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-4/estonia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-4/estonia/lithuania/">Estonia vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Da
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,161 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.