Slovenia vs Uruguay: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Slovenia
0
in 2025
Uruguay
0
in 2025
Slovenia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Slovenia
  • Uruguay
-4.0B-3.0B-2.0B-1.0B0200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0 against 0 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uruguay ahead.

Slovenia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 60 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s -964.58 million -29.14 million 935.44 million Uruguay
2010s -272.57 million -279.68 million 7.11 million Slovenia
2020s -32.37 million -200.00 million 167.63 million Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Slovenia or Uruguay?
Slovenia, at 0 against 0 in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Slovenia and Uruguay?
0, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Uruguay?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Slovenia and Uruguay rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Slovenia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Da. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Uruguay: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-4/slovenia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-4/slovenia/uruguay/">Slovenia vs Uruguay: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Short positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Da
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
62 places, 1,161 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.