Chile vs Slovenia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Chile
0
in 2025
Slovenia
26.90 million
in 2025
Chile rank
28th
Slovenia rank
25th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Chile
  • Slovenia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 26.90 million against 0 in Chile, a difference of 26.90 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 28th and Slovenia ranks 25th of 56 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 856.11 million 67.83 million 788.28 million Chile
2010s 23.89 million 29.57 million 5.69 million Slovenia
2020s 0 78.32 million 78.32 million Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Chile or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 26.90 million against 0 in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Chile and Slovenia?
26.90 million, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Slovenia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Chile and Slovenia rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Chile ranks 28th and Slovenia ranks 25th of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Inflows, Long positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Slovenia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-5/chile/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-5/chile/slovenia/">Chile vs Slovenia: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Inflows, Long positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
58 places, 1,142 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.