Denmark vs Italy: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Denmark
1.22 billion
in 2025
Italy
3.55 billion
in 2025
Denmark rank
14th
Italy rank
12th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Italy
02.0B4.0B6.0B199920122025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 3.55 billion against 1.22 billion in Denmark, a difference of 2.33 billion.

That makes Italy's figure about 2.9 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Italy ahead.

Denmark ranks 14th and Italy ranks 12th of 56 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 102.95 million 2.34 billion 2.23 billion Italy
2010s 358.46 million 1.59 billion 1.23 billion Italy
2020s 1.44 billion 2.08 billion 639.71 million Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Denmark or Italy?
Italy, at 3.55 billion against 1.22 billion in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Denmark and Italy?
2.33 billion, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Italy?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Italy rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 14th and Italy ranks 12th of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Inflows, Long positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Italy: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-5/denmark/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total-5/denmark/italy/">Denmark vs Italy: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total forwards and futures in foreign currencies vis 㣠vis the domestic currency (including the forward leg of currency swaps), Inflows, Long positions (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
58 places, 1,142 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.