Cyprus vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Cyprus
-69.52 million
in 2022
Lithuania
-26.44 million
in 2025
Cyprus rank
23rd
Lithuania rank
20th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Cyprus
  • Lithuania
-2.5B-2.0B-1.5B-1.0B-500.0M0200420142025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -26.44 million against -69.52 million in Cyprus, a difference of 43.08 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 20th of 87 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s -17.75 million -1.40 billion 1.38 billion Cyprus
2020s -23.17 million -1.01 billion 991.17 million Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Cyprus or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at -26.44 million against -69.52 million in Cyprus as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Cyprus and Lithuania?
43.08 million, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lithuania?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Cyprus and Lithuania rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Cyprus ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 20th of 87 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total foreign currency loans securities and deposits (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/cyprus/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/cyprus/lithuania/">Cyprus vs Lithuania: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total foreign currency loans securities and deposits (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,758 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.