Czechia vs Germany: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets

Czechia
-22.78 million
in 2025
Germany
-274,592
in 2025
Czechia rank
18th
Germany rank
15th

Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets over time

  • Czechia
  • Germany
-30.0B-20.0B-10.0B0199920122025

How they compare

Germany currently reports -274,592 against -22.78 million in Czechia, a difference of 22.51 million.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Germany ahead.

Czechia ranks 18th and Germany ranks 15th of 86 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Germany in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Germany Difference Ahead
2000s -336.12 million -3.32 billion 2.99 billion Czechia
2010s -593.57 million -676.19 million 82.62 million Czechia
2020s -497.72 million -22.42 million 475.30 million Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets, Czechia or Germany?
Germany, at -274,592 against -22.78 million in Czechia as of 2025.
What is the difference in predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets between Czechia and Germany?
22.51 million, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Germany?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Germany rank globally for predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets?
Czechia ranks 18th and Germany ranks 15th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total foreign currency loans securities and deposits (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social . Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Germany: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/czechia/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/predetermined-short-term-net-drains-on-foreign-currency-assets-nominal-value-total/czechia/germany/">Czechia vs Germany: Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Predetermined short-term net drains on foreign currency assets (nominal value), Total foreign currency loans securities and deposits (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,758 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.