Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money
Equatorial Guinea
1.10 trillion
in 2011
Iceland
1.13 trillion
in 2006
Equatorial Guinea rank
68th
Iceland rank
67th
Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.13 trillion against 1.10 trillion in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 35.08 billion.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 68th and Iceland ranks 67th of 163 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.49 billion | 63.34 billion | 54.86 billion | Iceland |
| 1990s | 12.46 billion | 181.38 billion | 168.92 billion | Iceland |
| 2000s | 167.39 billion | 557.86 billion | 390.48 billion | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher quasi-money, money plus quasi-money, Equatorial Guinea or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1.13 trillion against 1.10 trillion in Equatorial Guinea as of 2006.
- What is the difference in quasi-money, money plus quasi-money between Equatorial Guinea and Iceland?
- 35.08 billion, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Iceland?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2006.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Iceland rank globally for quasi-money, money plus quasi-money?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 68th and Iceland ranks 67th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Quasi-Money, Money plus Quasi-Money (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.