Curacao vs Naoero: Remittance inflows to GDP
Remittance inflows to GDP over time
- Curacao
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 5.3% against 5.2% in Curacao, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curacao ahead.
Curacao ranks 64th and Naoero ranks 63rd of 197 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher remittance inflows to gdp, Curacao or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 5.3% against 5.2% in Curacao as of 2018.
- What is the difference in remittance inflows to gdp between Curacao and Naoero?
- 0.1%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Naoero?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curacao and Naoero rank globally for remittance inflows to gdp?
- Curacao ranks 64th and Naoero ranks 63rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Development Indicators (WDI), World Bank, published as Remittance inflows to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Workers' remittances and compensation of employees comprise current transfers by migrant workers and wages and salaries earned by nonresident workers. Data are the sum of three items defined in the fifth edition of the IMF's Balance of Payments Manual: workers' remittances, compensation of employees, and migrants' transfers. Remittances are classified as current private transfers from migrant workers resident in the host country for more than a year, irrespective of their immigration status, to recipients in their country of origin. Migrants' transfers are defined as the net worth of migrants who are expected to remain in the host country for more than one year that is transferred from one country to another at the time of migration. Compensation of employees is the income of migrants who have lived in the host country for less than a year.