Argentina vs Malaysia: Reporting and Oversight (IA)
Reporting and Oversight (IA) over time
- Argentina
- Malaysia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 105.13 against 105.13 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 20th and Malaysia ranks 20th of 47 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 101.71 | 105.13 | 3.42 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reporting and oversight (ia), Argentina or Malaysia?
- Argentina, at 105.13 against 105.13 in Malaysia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in reporting and oversight (ia) between Argentina and Malaysia?
- 0, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Malaysia rank globally for reporting and oversight (ia)?
- Argentina ranks 20th and Malaysia ranks 20th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Reporting and Oversight (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).