Hungary vs New Zealand: Reporting and Oversight (IA)
Hungary
95.12
in 2018
New Zealand
95.12
in 2018
Hungary rank
43rd
New Zealand rank
43rd
Reporting and Oversight (IA) over time
- Hungary
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 95.12 against 95.12 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 43rd of 47 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 96.75 | 96.75 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reporting and oversight (ia), Hungary or New Zealand?
- Hungary, at 95.12 against 95.12 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in reporting and oversight (ia) between Hungary and New Zealand?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Hungary and New Zealand rank globally for reporting and oversight (ia)?
- Hungary ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 43rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Reporting and Oversight (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).