Moldova vs Uruguay: Reporting and Oversight (IA)
Reporting and Oversight (IA) over time
- Moldova
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 128.4 against 116.18 in Moldova, a difference of 12.22.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 4th of 47 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 110.79 | 120.26 | 9.47 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reporting and oversight (ia), Moldova or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 128.4 against 116.18 in Moldova as of 2018.
- What is the difference in reporting and oversight (ia) between Moldova and Uruguay?
- 12.22, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Moldova and Uruguay rank globally for reporting and oversight (ia)?
- Moldova ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 4th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Reporting and Oversight (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).