Moldova vs Zambia: Reporting and Oversight (IA)
Reporting and Oversight (IA) over time
- Moldova
- Zambia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 116.18 against 110.52 in Zambia, a difference of 5.66.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Zambia ahead.
Moldova ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 8th of 47 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 110.79 | 106.92 | 3.87 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reporting and oversight (ia), Moldova or Zambia?
- Moldova, at 116.18 against 110.52 in Zambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in reporting and oversight (ia) between Moldova and Zambia?
- 5.66, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Moldova and Zambia rank globally for reporting and oversight (ia)?
- Moldova ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 8th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Reporting and Oversight (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).