How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and United Kingdom?

29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs United Kingdom: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Kazakhstan

3,138 US dollar per person

in 2025

United Kingdom

3,081 US dollar per person

in 2025

Kazakhstan rank

58th

United Kingdom rank

59th

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

Kazakhstan
United Kingdom

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 3,138 US dollar per person against 3,081 US dollar per person in United Kingdom, a difference of 57 US dollar per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 58th and United Kingdom ranks 59th of 165 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1990s	132.6 US dollar per person	641.06 US dollar per person	508.46 US dollar per person	United Kingdom
2000s	670.92 US dollar per person	773.65 US dollar per person	102.74 US dollar per person	United Kingdom
2010s	1,604 US dollar per person	1,889 US dollar per person	285.01 US dollar per person	United Kingdom
2020s	2,075 US dollar per person	2,726 US dollar per person	650.12 US dollar per person	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Kazakhstan or United Kingdom?: Kazakhstan, at 3,138 US dollar per person against 3,081 US dollar per person in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Kazakhstan and United Kingdom?: 57 US dollar per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and United Kingdom?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and United Kingdom rank globally for reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: Kazakhstan ranks 58th and United Kingdom ranks 59th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs United Kingdom: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-capita/kazakhstan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-capita/kazakhstan/united-kingdom/">Kazakhstan vs United Kingdom: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per capita
Unit: US dollar per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 4,280 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.