Belarus vs South Africa: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Belarus
39,993 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
51,522 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
113th
South Africa rank
110th

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 51,522 US dollar per square kilometre against 39,993 US dollar per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 11,529 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 113th and South Africa ranks 110th of 164 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1,857 US dollar per square kilometre 4,288 US dollar per square kilometre 2,432 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 8,891 US dollar per square kilometre 16,340 US dollar per square kilometre 7,449 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 32,384 US dollar per square kilometre 40,618 US dollar per square kilometre 8,234 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 39,333 US dollar per square kilometre 48,554 US dollar per square kilometre 9,221 US dollar per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Belarus or South Africa?
South Africa, at 51,522 US dollar per square kilometre against 39,993 US dollar per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Belarus and South Africa?
11,529 US dollar per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?
Belarus ranks 113th and South Africa ranks 110th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Africa: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/belarus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/belarus/south-africa/">Belarus vs South Africa: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 4,002 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.