How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?

13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Suriname: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Botswana

8,369 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Suriname

8,387 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Botswana rank

144th

Suriname rank

143rd

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

Botswana
Suriname

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 8,387 US dollar per square kilometre against 8,369 US dollar per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 18 US dollar per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 164 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Suriname	Difference	Ahead
2010s	13,082 US dollar per square kilometre	3,872 US dollar per square kilometre	9,210 US dollar per square kilometre	Botswana
2020s	8,257 US dollar per square kilometre	6,414 US dollar per square kilometre	1,843 US dollar per square kilometre	Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Botswana or Suriname?: Suriname, at 8,387 US dollar per square kilometre against 8,369 US dollar per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Botswana and Suriname?: 18 US dollar per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: Botswana ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 164 places, 4,002 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.