Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Burkina Faso
3,228 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
3,484 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
155th
Namibia rank
154th

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k198920062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 3,484 US dollar per square kilometre against 3,228 US dollar per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 256 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 154th of 164 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 3,098 US dollar per square kilometre 1,193 US dollar per square kilometre 1,905 US dollar per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 3,417 US dollar per square kilometre 2,146 US dollar per square kilometre 1,272 US dollar per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 4,365 US dollar per square kilometre 3,221 US dollar per square kilometre 1,144 US dollar per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Burkina Faso or Namibia?
Namibia, at 3,484 US dollar per square kilometre against 3,228 US dollar per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Burkina Faso and Namibia?
256 US dollar per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Namibia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Namibia rank globally for reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?
Burkina Faso ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 154th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/burkina-faso/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/burkina-faso/namibia/">Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 4,002 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.