Chile vs New Zealand: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Chile
62,433 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
58,816 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
98th
New Zealand rank
101st

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

  • Chile
  • New Zealand
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199620092023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 62,433 US dollar per square kilometre against 58,816 US dollar per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 3,617 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 164 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 24,018 US dollar per square kilometre 35,066 US dollar per square kilometre 11,048 US dollar per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 52,734 US dollar per square kilometre 65,375 US dollar per square kilometre 12,641 US dollar per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 59,199 US dollar per square kilometre 56,714 US dollar per square kilometre 2,484 US dollar per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Chile or New Zealand?
Chile, at 62,433 US dollar per square kilometre against 58,816 US dollar per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Chile and New Zealand?
3,617 US dollar per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?
Chile ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Zealand: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/chile/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/chile/new-zealand/">Chile vs New Zealand: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 4,002 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.