How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?

19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs India: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)

Guatemala

198,872 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

India

209,593 US dollar per square kilometre

in 2023

Guatemala rank

60th

India rank

57th

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets) over time

Guatemala
India

How they compare

India currently reports 209,593 US dollar per square kilometre against 198,872 US dollar per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 10,721 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 60th and India ranks 57th of 164 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	India	Difference	Ahead
2000s	41,080 US dollar per square kilometre	76,825 US dollar per square kilometre	35,745 US dollar per square kilometre	India
2010s	83,635 US dollar per square kilometre	117,326 US dollar per square kilometre	33,691 US dollar per square kilometre	India
2020s	188,319 US dollar per square kilometre	202,255 US dollar per square kilometre	13,936 US dollar per square kilometre	India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets), Guatemala or India?: India, at 209,593 US dollar per square kilometre against 198,872 US dollar per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets) between Guatemala and India?: 10,721 US dollar per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and India rank globally for reserve assets, adjusted using imf accounting records (assets)?: Guatemala ranks 60th and India ranks 57th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs India: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/guatemala/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-assets-positions-us-dollar-per/guatemala/india/">Guatemala vs India: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit: US dollar per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 164 places, 4,002 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Reserve assets, Adjusted using IMF accounting records (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.