Grenada vs Latvia: Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per capita
Grenada
3,226 US dollar per person
in 2025
Latvia
3,290 US dollar per person
in 2025
Grenada rank
56th
Latvia rank
54th
Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per capita over time
- Grenada
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3,290 US dollar per person against 3,226 US dollar per person in Grenada, a difference of 64 US dollar per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Latvia ahead.
Grenada ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 54th of 169 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,733 US dollar per person | 2,301 US dollar per person | 567.5 US dollar per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 3,162 US dollar per person | 2,792 US dollar per person | 369.68 US dollar per person | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per capita, Grenada or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 3,290 US dollar per person against 3,226 US dollar per person in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per capita between Grenada and Latvia?
- 64 US dollar per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Latvia rank globally for reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per capita?
- Grenada ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.