Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
3,229 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
3,483 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
157th
Namibia rank
156th

Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k198920062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 3,483 US dollar per square kilometre against 3,229 US dollar per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 254 US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 157th and Namibia ranks 156th of 168 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 3,097 US dollar per square kilometre 1,193 US dollar per square kilometre 1,904 US dollar per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 3,411 US dollar per square kilometre 2,146 US dollar per square kilometre 1,264 US dollar per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 4,369 US dollar per square kilometre 3,219 US dollar per square kilometre 1,150 US dollar per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Namibia?
Namibia, at 3,483 US dollar per square kilometre against 3,229 US dollar per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Namibia?
254 US dollar per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Namibia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Namibia rank globally for reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 157th and Namibia ranks 156th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/namibia/">Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 4,119 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.