Hong Kong, China vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
405.16 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
12.99 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong, China rank
2nd
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
4th

Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199720102023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 405.16 million US dollar per square kilometre against 12.99 million US dollar per square kilometre in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 392.18 million US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 31.2 times Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 4th of 168 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 344.28 million US dollar per square kilometre 14.15 million US dollar per square kilometre 330.13 million US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 470.76 million US dollar per square kilometre 13.02 million US dollar per square kilometre 457.74 million US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Hong Kong, China, at 405.16 million US dollar per square kilometre against 12.99 million US dollar per square kilometre in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2023.
What is the difference in reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
392.18 million US dollar per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong, China and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for reserve assets (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 4th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/reserve-assets-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Hong Kong, China vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 4,119 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Reserve assets (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.